The 5-Second Trick For case study breach contract business and corporate law in pakistan

We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy in the information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to within the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can develop inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.

The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The plenty of this power casts an obligation around the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested to get a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Read more

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have heard the uncovered counsel for that parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as the issues with the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard towards the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(1) from the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession of your subjected premises on the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to become decided because of the competent court after hearing the parties if pending because the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer during the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has to see this part for interim custody of the topic premises When the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.

The necessary analysis (called ratio decidendi), then constitutes a precedent binding on other courts; further analyses not strictly necessary into the determination of your current case are called obiter dicta, which represent persuasive authority but will not be technically binding. By contrast, decisions in civil legislation jurisdictions are generally shorter, referring only to statutes.[4]

This is because transfer orders are typically regarded within the administrative discretion of your employer. However, there may be exceptions in cases where the transfer is inspired by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, They might have grounds to challenge before the right forum. Read more

For the foregoing reasons the instant suit is dismissed with no order concerning cost. Office to prepare decree in the above mentioned terms. Read more

When the state court hearing the case reviews the legislation, he finds that, when it mentions large multi-tenant properties in some context, it is actually really imprecise about whether the 90-day provision relates to all landlords. The judge, based on the specific circumstances of Stacy’s case, decides that all landlords are held on the ninety-working day notice requirement, and rules in Stacy’s check here favor.

Amir Abdul Majid, 2021 SCMR 420. 12. There is not any denial from the fact that in Government service it is anticipated that the persons possessing their character over board, free from any moral stigma, are to generally be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is often a condition precedent for appointment to some Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above is that the only impediment to being appointed to some Government service is definitely the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a means out or guise to accomplish absent with the candidature of your petitioner. Read more

Some bodies are offered statutory powers to issue guidance with persuasive authority or similar statutory effect, such as the Highway Code.

Article 199 in the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other sufficient remedy is provided by regulation." It is actually effectively-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust readily available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more

twelve . Const. P. 245/2025 (S.B.) Qurban Ali S/o Qasim V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The law enjoins the police to become scrupulously fair into the offender as well as the Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court and also from other courts but they have did not have any corrective effect on it.

These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and incorporate all notable cases decided through the court. Articles exist for almost all cases.

We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy of your information contained on this site, or perhaps the information linked to around the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can develop inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming for the main case, It is usually a nicely-recognized proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is subject on the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to reach at its independent findings over the evidence.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *